In past years, several reports have made an environmental and moral case for growing the market for green buildings. A recently launched IFC report makes the business case for doing so.
The market potential for green buildings in cities in developing countries is astronomical—an estimated $24.7 trillion by 2030, according to the IFC report Green Buildings: A Finance and Policy Blueprint for Emerging Markets. It breaks down that number by regions and by residential and commercial markets, and draws attention to developers, bankers, and investors who have found innovative ways to create profitable business models while going green.
“The report clearly underscores what the global green building community has been saying for a long time—that green buildings are good for people, are good for the planet, and are good for profit,” said Mahesh Ramanujam, president and chief executive officer of the U.S. Green Building Council. “In order to take green buildings to the next level, we must continue to clearly communicate how they can help save costs, improve value, attract new capital, and improve the social and economic health of their communities.”
The report found that, globally, the investment opportunity in emerging markets’ cities will be $15.7 trillion in residential markets, and $9 trillion in commercial markets by 2030. East Asia and the Pacific, by far, account for the largest market, with a combined $16 trillion in commercial and residential investment opportunities, according to the report. Latin America and the Caribbean come in second, with $4.2 trillion in total opportunities, while South Asia is third with $1.8 trillion in potential investments.
The numbers are based on future population growth forecasts—more than half of the world’s urban population will be in East Asia Pacific and South Asia by 2030—and on the important finding that 60 percent of the global area expected to be urban in 2030 has yet to be built.
Creating Opportunity from Scratch
Those still-to-be built homes and commercial structures, according to the report’s authors, are where the greatest opportunity exists: building green from the start, as opposed to renovating existing structures. The report shows that some businesses and banks already are doing that, and their experiences can inform others.
“Green buildings are an investment opportunity that teaches us the better the quality and sustainability of the project, the better the investment can become,” Alzbeta Klein, IFC’s director and global head of Climate Business, said in an interview. “There has been a perception that building green is more expensive. The report dispels several myths around that and shows that, in the long run, it’s more affordable to build green. In many commercial real estate markets, for instance, green buildings carry greater value. In residential buildings, people value it more and that helps resale as well.”
The report found that people who live and work in green buildings have lower utility bills and improved resource efficiency. Green buildings use on average between 20 to 40 percent less energy and water than traditional buildings, and homeowners can save 15 percent to 20 percent on average on their utility bills.
For investors and financers, the report found that green buildings have higher rental income than traditional buildings - up to 8 percent higher and sale premiums up to 31 percent higher. Green buildings also have higher occupancy rates of up to 23 percent, higher tenant retention, and lower vacancy rates.
Green buildings comprise a relatively small share of global construction now—global investments accounted for $423 billion of the $5 trillion spent on building construction and renovation in 2017. But the market is expected to grow at a compound annual rate of more than 10 percent between 2017 and 2023, according to the Principles for Responsible Investment.
In Latin America, Bancolombia, Colombia’s largest bank, financed an expansion into green construction with a $117 million green bond with IFC in 2016. Using those proceeds, the bank offered green construction financing at a rate 0.5 to 2 percent lower than conventional loans – with the lower rates going to projects that are certified green. But that wasn’t all. Bancolombia helped build a pipeline of projects by holding events in 17 cities around the country, attracting 500 property developers. The lower rates and robust marketing strategy resulted in financing for 25 developers’ green construction projects within just a few months.
A second regional example is Costa Rican bank Banco Promerica, which obtained a $30 million loan from the Dutch development bank, FMO, to launch a green construction program. The bank charged developers 8.75 percent for green construction finance (compared to 9.25 percent for other loans) and offered a 0.75 percent front-end fee instead of the usual 1 percent.
“We’ve been on a journey of convincing developers to build green and undergo the process of certification,” said Michelle Espinach, sustainable bank manager for Promerica. She said that interest from developers has picked up, noting that when the project started, she was “chasing developers and now they are calling me. There are multiple residential developers who want to certify green.”
Certifying—and Building Trust
The certification process, according to developers, bankers, and government officials, creates a clear definition of a green building, avoids self-reporting that can lead to inconsistent standards and green washing, and opens the possibility of the asset being eligible for green bonds and other types of financing. These certifications include IFC’s EDGE, LEED, China’s Three-Star, BREEAM, Green Star from the Green Building Council South Africa, Green Mark in Singapore, and the India Green Buildings Council’s rating system.